We need more evidence to justify this, perhaps try building against zynq_k7
and compare it to zynq implementations to see if they really do produce
different results. In the near future (2.2 or 2.3) we are removing the
requirement of having to modify OpenCPI repo to add new targets or
architectures and it would be on the OSP developer to decide if a new
target is necessary.
Aaron
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 6:56 AM <aponchak_at_geontech.onmicrosoft.com> wrote:
>
> https://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Design-Entry/What-to-expect-when-using-edf-files-compiled-for-Artix-7-in-a/m-p/1238396#M26610
>
> The link above is post on the Xilinx forum that posses the question of
> what to expect when using EDF files built for A7 (HdlTarget=zynq) in a
> design which is actually targeting a K7, which represents the current
> situation when building for a PicoZed 7030 platform.
>
> I propose creating a new HdlTarget “zynq_k7†and properly assigning the
> 7-series devices across '“zynq†(A7) and “zynq_k7†(K7). The following are
> the proposed changes to hdl-targets.mk:
>
> +HdlTargets_xilinx:=isim virtex5 virtex6 spartan3adsp spartan6 zynq_ise
> zynq zynq_k7 zynq_ultra xsim x4sim
> -HdlTargets_zynq:=xc7z007s xc7z012s xc7z014s xc7z010 xc7z015 xc7z020
> xc7z030 xc7z035 xc7z045 xc7z100 xc7z035i
> +HdlTargets_zynq:=xc7z007s xc7z012s xc7z014s xc7z010 xc7z015 xc7z020
> +HdlTargets_zynq_k7:=xc7z030 xc7z035 xc7z045 xc7z100 xc7z035i
> +HdlDefaultTarget_zynq_k7:=xc7z030
> +HdlToolSet_zynq_k7:=vivado
>
> Thoughts?
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list -- discuss_at_lists.opencpi.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave_at_lists.opencpi.org
>
Received on Mon May 10 2021 - 15:58:40 CDT