THis is probably because your XML says it is device?
On 4/23/20 1:23 PM, Brian Padalino wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:47 AM Brian Padalino <bpadalino_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Brandon,
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:37 AM Brandon Luquette <bluquette_at_geontech.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Brian,
>>>
>>> If I understand the problem correctly, the issue is that HDL devices
>>> cannot be instanced in assemblies. They can only be instanced in containers
>>> (which encapsulate assemblies) or platform configurations (which are
>>> instanced alongside assemblies).
>>>
>>> An example of a container instance for the e31x platform:
>>>
>>> https://gitlab.com/opencpi/osp/ocpi.osp.e3xx/-/blob/develop/hdl/assemblies/empty/cnt_e31x_mimo_xcvr_filter.xml
>>>
>>> An example of a platform configuration instance for the e31x platform:
>>>
>>> https://gitlab.com/opencpi/osp/ocpi.osp.e3xx/-/blob/develop/hdl/platforms/e31x/cfg_1rx_1tx_mode_2_cmos.xml
>>>
>>> Hope this helps.
>>>
>> Yes, thanks. It seems I got confused about devices versus components. I
>> am making something that is more like a component (does not connect to
>> external pins by itself) and not a device (connects to external pins).
>>
>> I'm going to refactor and try to make it a component.
>>
> So I made it a component, but something new is happening. It seems the
> names of my EDIF netlists have an '_rv' attached to it. I did a comparison
> between the mfsk_mapper.hdl in the opencpi project, and I can't understand
> why that worker netlist is called mfsk_mapper.edf when mine is called
> <name>_rv.edf.
>
> Has anyone got any information on why it's called _rv instead of just what
> hte name of the device is?
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
>
Received on Thu Apr 23 2020 - 17:28:54 CDT